Product

From an expert opinion
to a map of what can be challenged.

AR3S works with the expert opinion together with the medical records and the questions put to the expert. It breaks the opinion down into individual claims, checks how well they are supported by the sources, looks for equally defensible interpretations and prepares a report in which findings are ranked by strength and relevance to the case.

Explore the demo (Polish)

Fictional data and expert opinion. The demo shows a saved session; in the full AR3S system, the strategy module is interactive.

The material

The opinion is analysed in the context of the whole case.

The expert opinion is the starting point. It is accompanied by medical records, the questions put to the expert and other materials that matter when assessing the conclusions.

AR3S uses these materials as a point of reference: it separates what follows from the records from the expert’s interpretation and checks the opinion’s internal coherence.

The aim is simple: the lawyer sees where each finding comes from and decides whether it is worth pursuing.

The report

Every finding: what, why and what to do about it.

Each material finding is described clearly enough for the lawyer to assess its strength, basis and procedural usefulness. The strongest come first.

The relevant passage

The precise part of the opinion the finding relates to — a quotation, not a general assessment of the document.

What the problem is

A direct explanation: an omission, an unsupported inference, an overgeneralisation, a factual error or another weakness in the reasoning.

Alternative interpretation

An equally defensible reading of the same facts, with reasoning — including where the expert’s conclusion is not plainly wrong.

Basis for the assessment

Reference to the medical records, other case materials and specialist knowledge relevant to the finding.

Strength of the argument

How strong the finding is and how much it matters for the case. The report sets priorities on this basis.

Possible next step

A suggestion as to whether the issue is worth raising in objections, addressing through further questions or checking in more detail.

CEM

Controlled, multi-stage AI analysis.

CEM is AR3S’s analytical core. The analysis is divided into specialised, clearly separated stages responsible for different parts of the assessment. Their outputs are cross-checked, so the analytical path and the final result can be traced and reviewed.

Full coverage of the opinion

Every material claim goes through the analysis. A long document is not reduced to one answer in which important details get absorbed into the dominant narrative.

Control at every stage

The stages are separated and checked. Omissions and inferences unsupported by the material are easier to catch.

A result that can be checked

Every finding is linked to a passage of the opinion and to the source material, so the lawyer can judge its soundness independently.

Where it fits

Above all where medicine has a real bearing on the outcome of the case.

AR3S is being built for matters in which assessing an expert opinion requires more than legal analysis alone.

Types of case

Personal injury and compensation

Accidents, injuries and disputes over health consequences, causation or the amount of compensation.

Medical malpractice

Cases in which diagnosis, treatment, causation and the interpretation of medical records need to be assessed carefully.

Social security and disability

Proceedings concerning work capacity, independent living and degree of disability.

Who it is for

Law firms and litigators

Lawyers who have little time to assess an unfavourable opinion and decide what in it to challenge.

Insurers

With a high volume of cases, even a small improvement in the quality of expert-opinion assessment has significant operational and financial impact.

Pilot programmes

Pilots with law firms
and legal teams.

How a pilot works: you send a pseudonymised opinion with the records, receive the AR3S report and we go through it together on a real case. We welcome lawyers and legal teams for whom a medical expert opinion materially affects the case.

contact@ar3s.tech