Detailed analysis of the opinion
AR3S analyses the opinion passage by passage, focusing on the expert’s reasoning, the consistency of the conclusions and how they are justified.
Assessing an expert opinion requires specialist knowledge that a lawyer does not have.
When an expert opinion is unfavourable, a lawyer must assess whether there are grounds to challenge it. To do this effectively, however, the lawyer needs access to specialist expertise needed to verify the expert’s reasoning and conclusions.
A reliable assessment requires examining multiple elements: the logic of the reasoning, internal consistency, alignment with the evidence, the soundness of the methodology and consistency with specialist knowledge. AR3S helps structure this analysis and points to passages that may provide grounds for challenging the opinion.